---
title: "Antigravity Development Security Checklist"
canonical_url: "https://move78int.com/antigravity-agentic-development-security-checklist.html"
source_html: "https://move78int.com/antigravity-agentic-development-security-checklist.html"
page_type: "technical_guide_tool_page"
primary_keyword: "Antigravity agentic development security checklist"
secondary_keywords:
  - "AI coding agent security"
  - "agentic development security"
  - "secure SDLC evidence"
  - "Antigravity CLI security"
target_audience:
  - "CTO"
  - "engineering lead"
  - "CISO"
  - "AppSec lead"
  - "security reviewer"
product_ladder_destination: "ACT-2, Implementation Sprint"
primary_schema_type: "WebApplication"
schema_types:
  - "WebPage"
  - "WebApplication"
  - "BreadcrumbList"
  - "FAQPage"
date_published: "2026-05-23"
last_updated: "2026-05-23"
last_reviewed: "2026-05-23"
owner: "Move78 International Limited"
commercial_route: "ACT-2, Implementation Sprint"
claim_control: "Informational implementation-support content only; not legal, audit, certification, procurement, secure-code-review, or security assurance."
---
# Antigravity Agentic Development Security Checklist

**URL:** https://move78int.com/antigravity-agentic-development-security-checklist.html  
**Last reviewed:** 2026-05-23  
**Owner:** Move78 International Limited  
**Purpose:** First-pass security and governance evidence matrix for teams using Google Antigravity, Antigravity CLI, AI coding agents, terminal-based agents, and repository automation.

## Direct answer

If an AI coding agent can read files, run commands, change code, call tools, or prepare pull requests, treat it as a development control surface. The minimum evidence set is repository scope, secrets boundary, terminal-command approval, human code review, test evidence, artifact verification, and rollback path.

## Matrix scoring

Missing = 0. Defined = 1. Enforced with evidence = 2. Maximum score = 24.

| Score | Likely status | Suggested next action |
|---:|---|---|
| 0 to 6 | Not ready for agentic coding scale | Define scope, secrets, terminal, review, test, and rollback boundaries. |
| 7 to 12 | Partial development controls | Convert informal rules into retained PR, log, review, and evidence records. |
| 13 to 18 | Managed but not release-ready | Stress-test weak controls before connecting to production repositories or release paths. |
| 19 to 24 | Strong first-pass development control | Review edge cases, high-impact workflows, and runtime hardening needs. |

## Control rows

| Security control | Evidence objective |
|---|---|
| Project and repository scope | The repository, branch, task, and files in scope are written down before the agent starts work. |
| Secrets and credential boundary | The agent cannot read, print, commit, or expose secrets, tokens, keys, environment files, or credentials. |
| Local file and workspace access | The team defines what local folders, generated files, config files, and temporary artifacts the agent may touch. |
| Terminal and command execution | Shell commands, build steps, package installs, migrations, and destructive commands require a written boundary. |
| Dependency and package changes | Package updates, new libraries, lockfile changes, and transitive dependency changes are reviewed before merge. |
| Code change review | A human reviewer checks generated code, tests, error handling, security impact, and maintainability before acceptance. |
| Test and build evidence | The agent or developer keeps test results, build logs, screenshots, recordings, or other review artifacts. |
| Pull request and branch control | Agent-generated changes use reviewable branches, pull requests, commit messages, and reviewer assignment. |
| External connection boundary | Browser use, web fetches, APIs, MCP servers, cloud projects, and third-party tools have explicit approval rules. |
| Artifact verification | Screenshots, plans, recordings, diffs, and logs are used to verify what the agent claims it changed. |
| Rollback and release separation | The team knows how to revert agent changes and keeps deployment separate from code generation. |
| Admin policy and observability | Admins can review access, usage, logs, policy settings, and who is allowed to use agentic development features. |

## Five control areas

1. Scope: define what code and files the agent can touch.
2. Secrets: define what the agent must never read or expose.
3. Execution: define which commands require approval.
4. Review: define who validates generated code before merge.
5. Rollback: define how unsafe changes are reversed.

## Related Move78 pages

- Google AI Governance Readiness Checklist: https://move78int.com/google-ai-governance-readiness-checklist.html
- Google Managed Agents Control Matrix: https://move78int.com/google-managed-agents-control-matrix.html
- ACT tiers: https://move78int.com/pricing.html
- Implementation Sprint: https://move78int.com/ai-controls-implementation-sprint.html

## Source basis and limits

This page is based on public Google and standards sources reviewed on 2026-05-23. It is intended as operational implementation guidance, not legal, audit, certification, procurement, secure-code, or security assurance.