Skip to main content
Colorado ADMT: 1 Jan 2027 · EU high-risk: 2 Dec 2027 (Annex III); 2 Aug 2028 (Annex I)

Build the AI governance evidence your buyers and board will ask for

For the governance lead preparing a deployment review, ACT provides eleven editable records for intake, ownership, supplier checks and executive decisions. Directors receive a board oversight deck and written briefing. Your team supplies the evidence and makes the decisions.

Governance evidence and implementation support. No SaaS lock-in. Led by a cybersecurity and AI governance practitioner.
Not legal, audit, certification, conformity-assessment, or security advice.

EU AI Act evidence and training

Two independently usable products for deployment records and staff learning. Neither requires the other.

Explore the contents, intended uses and limits of each product.

Move78 EU AI Act Deployer Evidence Pack

Four editable Word documents and two Excel workbooks with 15 sheets. Document 01 includes 25 procurement questions. Operational tables support 21 records each. Training is not included.

₹99,000 including applicable taxes

View product

Move78 AI Literacy & Human Oversight Training

Three modules, 12 short text lessons, 3 practice scenarios and 24 assessment questions with feedback. Includes its own guides and workplace forms. The Evidence Pack is not included.

₹99,000 including applicable taxes

View product

Optional EU AI Act Evidence & Training Bundle

₹149,000 including applicable taxes. Both independent products, supplied separately. No integrated application, ACT entitlement or additional use rights.

View bundle contents.

These offers are for Indian businesses, billed in INR. Purchase availability is shown with your product selection. Contact Move78 about invoice requirements.

ACT addresses broader AI governance and control evidence. Oversight, supplier evidence and incident responsibilities can overlap. Compare the products and their limits.

How can Move78 ACT help you? 30 second check

Move78 helps teams organise review records: the AI use case, accountable owners, supplier evidence, decisions and follow-up actions.

Fast decision rule: Review the ACT inventory when your immediate need is editable evidence and decision records.
If your immediate gap is legal interpretation, certification, or live approval workflows, use counsel, auditors, or a GRC platform first.

Explore free artifacts

Try the free resources to identify your evidence needs.

Flagship product

Check ACT scope against your evidence needs

Connect vendor reviews, governance decisions and leadership reporting to the evidence your team needs. For the governance lead preparing a deployment review, ACT provides eleven editable records for intake, ownership, supplier checks and executive decisions. Directors receive a board oversight deck and written briefing. Your team supplies the evidence and makes the decisions.

Bring the AI use cases, current records and oversight decisions your team needs to address.

Policy scope to confirm

Identify the policy records, accountable owners and review decisions your team needs.

Reporting scope to confirm

Identify the reporting records, accountable owners and review decisions your team needs.

Agentic scope to confirm

Identify the specialist records, accountable owners and review decisions your team needs.

Rollout layer

A path from documents to ownership, review cadence, and implementation follow-through.

Discuss the evidence you need

Bring your AI use cases, governance questions and existing records. Identify the evidence gaps, then agree the scope of the work.

Control reuse

Mapping requirements

Identify the frameworks relevant to your organisation and discuss any mapping requirements with Move78.

Evidence trail

Evidence requirements

Connect each evidence requirement to an owner, a review decision and the record needed to support it.

Ownership model

One operating path

Assign owners, review cadence, escalation routes, and evidence tasks before configuring a larger GRC platform.

Why teams get stuck

Most teams do not fail because they lack documents. They fail because the documents are disconnected: one ISO template, one NIST spreadsheet, one vendor questionnaire, one board question, and no owner for the evidence file.

1

The usual gap

Separate document packs do not tell a lean team which artifact owns the decision. That is why governance stalls: no single matrix shows the control, owner, record, and next review.

2

The ACT approach

Start with inventory and risk records for the baseline. Where several teams need connected evidence, discuss vendor review, board reporting and agentic AI governance.

3

Then assign evidence owners

Make each record ownable by a business, security, privacy, compliance, legal, or product stakeholder.

Eight ACT workflow areas

The eleven files support eight connected workflow areas. Your team collects technical evidence, records decisions and follows up on outstanding actions.

Workflow areaACT evidence recordHuman action
IntakeAI initiative intake and risk ownershipScope the use case and name the accountable executive.
Agent authorityAgent authority and tool boundariesDocument permissions and test the actual boundaries.
MCP and skillsSandbox gate and review decisionRecord test evidence, restrictions and next review.
SuppliersVendor review and contract negotiation recordResolve evidence and terms with procurement and legal reviewers.
Human reviewPost-deployment drift and human reviewReview samples, overrides and material changes.
ContainmentIncident containment and recovery runbookTest downstream effects and restart conditions.
Executive decisionsRisk appetite and exception recordRecord conditions, expiry and action owners.
Board oversightBoard deck and written briefingPresent decisions, uncertainty and follow-up.

ACT is implementation support only. It does not provide legal advice, certification assurance, audit assurance, or safe-harbor assurance.

One toolkit, clear ownership and next actions

ACT brings eleven editable files together across eight workflow areas. Use free resources to explore a specific evidence need, or discuss separately scoped implementation support.

Free resources

Start with a focused question

Use the existing tools and downloads to identify an evidence gap and decide what to review next.

View free downloads
Separate service

Implementation Sprint

Discuss implementation scope, owners, sequencing and evidence review. Service scope and commitments are agreed separately after a fit review.

Discuss implementation support

Agentic AI, MCP, and OpenClaw governance

Agentic systems can plan, call tools and trigger workflow actions. Identify the governance records your systems need, then discuss those requirements with Move78.

Action-space assessment

Define what the agent can do, which systems it can touch, and where human approval is required.

Autonomy boundaries

Set permission boundaries, escalation triggers, override controls, and emergency stop expectations.

Agent registry

Track deployed agents, owners, permissions, tools, skills, review dates, and status.

OpenClaw governance context

ACT includes an agent incident containment and recovery runbook. Your team must test the actual stop procedure, downstream effects and restart conditions.

Run OpenClaw assessment →

Choose by role

ACT is one editable AI Controls Toolkit with eleven core files across eight workflow areas. It supports evidence collection and human decisions; it does not enforce controls or certify compliance.

EU

EU AI Act readiness

EU AI Compass is a separate free platform focused on EU AI Act readiness tools and guides. Move78 ACT provides eleven editable records across intake, agent authority, MCP and skills, suppliers, human review, incident containment, executive decisions and board oversight.

Visit EU AI Compass →

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers for buyers checking whether Move78 ACT fits their evidence, governance, and implementation needs.

For the governance lead preparing a deployment review, ACT provides eleven editable records for intake, ownership, supplier checks and executive decisions. Directors receive a board oversight deck and written briefing. Your team supplies the evidence and makes the decisions.

ACT is one editable AI Controls Toolkit with eleven core files across eight workflow areas. It supports evidence collection and human decisions; it does not enforce controls or certify compliance. ACT costs ₹99,000, inclusive of applicable GST. This is a one-time purchase in INR, with no recurring subscription. ACT is a digital download. A download link is sent by email within one business day after successful payment. Refund requests may be made within 30 calendar days after successful payment.

Discuss any Colorado mapping requirements and their source basis with Move78. ACT is not legal advice, a statutory defence or proof of compliance.

Move78 ACT is led by Move78 under the direction of Abhishek G Sharma, a cybersecurity and AI governance practitioner. Discuss evidence requirements in the context of your organisation's legal, audit, security and operating needs.

No. Start with the governance decisions and evidence your organisation needs. Customer diligence, internal oversight, board reporting and vendor review can require records even when certification is not the immediate goal.

An enterprise GRC platform can be useful after a team knows its AI systems, owners, controls, workflows, and evidence model. Many SMEs need the evidence architecture first. An ACT discussion can help define the records and ownership requirements before you choose a platform.

Start with the evidence gap

Run a free assessment first. Then discuss the evidence you need and whether ACT scope or implementation support fits the gap.

Source review dates are stated in the relevant guides. It provides product information and implementation-support guidance only. It is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, safe-harbor assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.

Built by Abhishek G Sharma, founder of Move78. 20+ years in cybersecurity and risk management. ISO 42001 Lead Auditor, ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, CISA, CISM, CRISC, CEH, CCSK, CAIGO, and CAIRO. Also the architect of EU AI Compass, a separate privacy-first EU AI Act tools site.