Estimated time: ~4 minutes · 12 questions · 6 control domains
A focused 12-question assessment covering the six governance domains that determine whether your OpenClaw and MCP-based agent deployments are visible, controlled, and defensible under enterprise scrutiny.
Questions scored 0 (Not Started) or 1 (Ad Hoc), lowest answer score first. Equal scores follow question order; this is not an impact ranking.
ACT includes supplier and subprocessor review records and proposed contract wording for local legal and procurement review. Your team verifies the evidence and resolves open issues. Use the identified control gaps to explain your requirements.
Data sovereignty confirmation. This assessment ran entirely in your browser. Your answers never left your device. We did not transmit, sync, or store a single byte of your responses. Once you close this page, all data is gone.
It assesses governance readiness across six domains specific to OpenClaw and MCP-based agent deployments: deployment governance, identity and credential control, skill and connector supply chain, shadow agent detection, incident response readiness, and human oversight and autonomy bounding. 12 questions, approximately 4 minutes.
The questions are designed for OpenClaw and MCP-based agent architectures specifically, but the governance principles apply to any autonomous agent deployment. Organizations using other agent frameworks will find the control categories relevant.
No. The assessment runs entirely in your browser. Answers are not transmitted, synchronized, or stored by Move78. Once you close the page, all data is gone.
The AI Governance Quick Assessment provides a broad baseline across ownership, use, controls and management evidence. This OpenClaw assessment focuses on agent security governance. Choose the screen that matches the question you need to answer, then review its identified gaps.
Review the identified agent governance gaps, assign owners and agree the supporting evidence needed. ACT includes editable records for agent authority, tool boundaries, MCP and skill reviews, human review and incident containment. Technical owners must test the actual implementation.
Source review dates are stated in the relevant guides. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.