Colorado AI Act in · EU AI Act (High-Risk) in · ISO 42001 + NIST AI RMF + OpenClaw + Agentic AI — organized into editable implementation artifacts

Estimated time: ~4 minutes · 12 questions · 6 control domains

OpenClaw Agent Security Governance Assessment

A focused 12-question assessment covering the six governance domains that determine whether your OpenClaw and MCP-based agent deployments are visible, controlled, and defensible under enterprise scrutiny.

In-browser processing
No account required
No login required
OpenClawMCPOWASP Agentic Top 10Agentic AI Governance

Privacy-first design. This assessment runs entirely in your browser. The assessment is designed to run in your browser without account creation or server-side answer submission. Avoid entering confidential information into any free-text field.

Live Assessment Dashboard
Score
0/36
Answered
0/12
Posture
Not assessed
Gaps Found
0

Assessment Complete

0/36

Top Priority Gaps

Questions scored 0 (Not Started) or 1 (Ad Hoc) - highest impact first.

Domain Breakdown

Close the Gaps Identified Above

AI Controls Professional includes the agentic AI governance module with policy templates, incident response procedures, skill approval workflows, and the full MCP security governance checklist.

Compare Toolkit Tiers

Data sovereignty confirmation. This assessment ran entirely in your browser. Your answers never left your device. We did not transmit, sync, or store a single byte of your responses. Once you close this page, all data is gone.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What does this OpenClaw assessment cover?

It assesses governance readiness across six domains specific to OpenClaw and MCP-based agent deployments: deployment governance, identity and credential control, skill and connector supply chain, shadow agent detection, incident response readiness, and human oversight and autonomy bounding. 12 questions, approximately 4 minutes.

Is this assessment specific to OpenClaw or does it cover other agent frameworks?

The questions are designed for OpenClaw and MCP-based agent architectures specifically, but the governance principles apply to any autonomous agent deployment. Organizations using other agent frameworks will find the control categories relevant.

Does this assessment store my answers?

No. The assessment runs entirely in your browser. Answers are not transmitted, synchronized, or stored by Move78. Once you close the page, all data is gone.

How does this relate to the AI Governance Readiness Assessment?

The AI Governance Readiness Assessment covers broad AI governance across ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and Colorado AI Act (50 questions, 12 domains). This OpenClaw assessment focuses specifically on agent security governance (12 questions, 6 domains). Organizations deploying autonomous agents should take both.

What should I do with the results?

The results identify which agent governance domains need immediate attention. For implementation artifacts including policy templates, incident response procedures, and the agentic AI governance module, see AI Controls Professional.

Source and review note: This page was last reviewed on 6 May 2026 against the current Move78 public site baseline and relevant official or authoritative sources where laws, standards, frameworks, cybersecurity controls, product scope, pricing, or support policy are discussed. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.