Colorado AI Act in · EU AI Act (High-Risk) in · ISO 42001 + NIST AI RMF + OpenClaw + Agentic AI — organized into editable implementation artifacts
Home › Tools › AI Agent Identity & OAuth Grant Exposure Check
Agent identity and OAuth governance check

AI Agent Identity & OAuth Grant Exposure Check

Find out in under 4 minutes whether AI agents are running on governed identities or hidden OAuth grants.

3-4 minutes 12 scored questions No login

This is a governance visibility screen for AI-agent identities and OAuth-connected access paths. It is not an IAM platform, browser extension, or grant-monitoring product.

  • Screens inventory coverage, identity ownership, OAuth-grant visibility, scope discipline, logging quality, revocation readiness, and policy coverage.
  • Separates governed visibility from material blind spots before hidden access paths turn into an incident.
  • Routes cleanly into AI Controls Starter for inventory and gap analysis, or AI Controls Professional when policy, evidence, incident, and implementation controls are missing.
Start assessment See ACT pricing
Enterprise AI agent identity governance scene showing controlled OAuth access, accountable non-human identities, revocation control, and audit visibility.
AI-agent identity governance across OAuth grants, ownership, scope control, revocation, and attributable logging.
Identity visibility

This screen classifies identity and OAuth exposure fast. It does not enumerate grants, export an inventory, or replace IAM tooling.

Interactive screen

Assessment

Use this to classify whether AI-agent identities and OAuth grants are visibly governed, partially governed, materially exposed, or effectively unmanaged.

Question 1 of 12 0% complete
Question 1 of 12

What this result should change

This section classify identity and grant exposure quickly, surface the most significant visibility gaps, and recommend an appropriate implementation path.

What this tool evaluates about agent identities and OAuth grants

This assessment evaluates whether AI-agent access is visible, attributable, governable, and revocable across inventories, grants, scopes, ownership, discovery, and policy coverage.

What a green result does not mean

A green result does not prove hidden grants are impossible. It means the current posture looks more governable than the other states and still needs discipline to stay that way.

Why AI Controls Professional changes by severity

Green and amber results usually need structured inventory, gap analysis, and dashboards first, which sit in AI Controls Starter. Severe red states need policy, evidence, incident, and implementation assets, which sit in AI Controls Professional.

Where to go next

Use the workbook bridge when the problem is visibility and cleanup. Use the implementation bridge when the result shows structural policy, ownership, incident, or evidence failures.

AI Controls Starter

Structure the inventory, gap analysis, and dashboard baseline for agent identities and OAuth access.

AI Controls Professional

Move to the full policy, incident, evidence, and implementation layer when the result is materially exposed or blind.

Shadow AI Exposure Check

Use the broader shadow-AI screen when the problem extends beyond identities and OAuth grants.

This page is informational only. It does not provide legal advice, compliance certification, or an audit conclusion.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What does this tool evaluate about agent identities and OAuth grants?

It evaluates inventory coverage, identity model, OAuth grant visibility, scope discipline, revocation readiness, attribution quality, ownership, policy coverage, and discovery discipline for AI-agent access paths.

Does a green result mean hidden grants are impossible?

No. It means the current posture appears more governable than the other states. Hidden grants can still emerge if discovery, recertification, or ownership discipline weakens.

Why are ownership and revocation weighted so heavily?

Because hidden OAuth access becomes materially harder to contain when nobody clearly owns the agent or grant and the organization cannot revoke access quickly during an incident.

Why does this tool route some results to AI Controls Starter and others to ACT Tier 2?

Earlier-maturity results usually need visibility, inventory, and gap analysis first, which sit in AI Controls Starter. Severe red states need policy, incident, evidence, and implementation controls, which sit in AI Controls Professional.

Does this tool store anything I enter?

No. The assessment runs entirely in the browser. Answers are not stored, synced, or submitted to a server.

Source and review note: This page was last reviewed on 6 May 2026 against the current Move78 public site baseline and relevant official or authoritative sources where laws, standards, frameworks, cybersecurity controls, product scope, pricing, support policy, or implementation guidance are discussed. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.