FRIA Lite + Colorado Consumer-Rights Forms
Document AI impact, consumer-rights handling, annual-review readiness, and evidence records for Colorado-style deployer obligations.
Open artifact page →A 5-question decision tree that determines whether you are a developer, deployer, both, or neither under the Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205). Shows applicable obligations with C.R.S. statutory citations and checks safe-harbor supporting evidence questions.
The Colorado AI Act affirmative defense (C.R.S. 6-1-1706) requires demonstrating documented compliance with NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001. The AI Controls Toolkit (ACT) provides the unified controls matrix mapping both frameworks to every Colorado obligation with C.R.S. section-level precision.
See AI Controls Starter →This tool is provided for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Organizations should consult qualified legal counsel for jurisdiction-specific compliance guidance. Colorado AI Act references are based on SB 24-205 as amended by SB 25B-004 (effective date: June 30, 2026). C.R.S. section references are for transparency; consult the full statutory text for authoritative interpretation.
The purpose of this checker is to classify your Colorado AI Act exposure quickly, highlight the most important statutory obligations, and surface governance gaps and recommend an appropriate implementation path.
Whether your organization is a developer, deployer, both, or neither under the Colorado AI Act. It maps your role to specific statutory obligations and checks whether documented framework compliance supports the affirmative defense.
It does not mean you are fully compliant. It means you have documented framework coverage that supports the affirmative defense. Ongoing evidence, impact assessments, and consumer-rights procedures are still required.
The checker tells you what obligations exist. AI Controls Starter provides the unified controls matrix that maps every Colorado obligation to ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF controls with evidence requirements. That is the documentation pathway the safe harbor requires.
When the assessment reveals documentation and evidence gaps requiring policy, procedure, and implementation ownership, AI Controls Professional provides the full implementation evidence pack.
See the unified controls matrix, gap analysis checklist, and risk register that maps Colorado obligations to ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF.
Read the implementation guide covering developer obligations, deployer obligations, safe harbor, and enforcement timeline.
Take the 50-question assessment covering 12 control domains across ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and Colorado AI Act.
It determines whether your organization is classified as a developer, deployer, both, or neither under the Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205). It then shows the specific statutory obligations that apply, checks safe-harbor supporting evidence questions, and assesses consumer rights readiness.
A consequential decision has a material legal or similarly significant effect on a consumer in areas such as employment, financial services, insurance, housing, healthcare, education, legal services, or government services. The definition is in C.R.S. 6-1-1701.
The Act provides an affirmative defense (C.R.S. 6-1-1706) for developers and deployers who maintain documented compliance with a recognized AI governance framework such as NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001. It does not create immunity, but it may strengthen the legal defense against algorithmic discrimination claims.
The Colorado AI Act takes effect on June 30, 2026. The Attorney General enforces the Act through the existing Colorado Consumer Protection Act framework.
No. This is an informational triage tool. It references C.R.S. statutory sections for transparency but does not constitute legal advice, a compliance determination, or a safe harbor certification. Consult qualified legal counsel for jurisdiction-specific guidance.
No. This tool runs entirely in your browser. Your selections are not stored, synced, exported, or transmitted. When you close or refresh the page, all data is gone.
Use this after the checker if the system may require impact, consumer-rights, annual review, or deployer evidence tracking. It is an evidence starter, not legal advice.
Document AI impact, consumer-rights handling, annual-review readiness, and evidence records for Colorado-style deployer obligations.
Open artifact page →Source and review note: This page was last reviewed on 6 May 2026 against the current Move78 public site baseline and relevant official or authoritative sources where laws, standards, frameworks, cybersecurity controls, product scope, pricing, support policy, or implementation guidance are discussed. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.