Editorial Methodology and Source Review
Move78 source review methodology defines how AI governance, standards, cybersecurity, and commercial product pages should be written, checked, and limited. The goal is simple: useful implementation guidance without fake certainty, legal overreach, security guarantees, or unsupported product claims.
What this methodology controls
Move78 source review methodology controls the claims, structure, and limits of public implementation content. It is a publishing discipline, not a substitute for qualified legal, audit, certification, or security review.
Source hierarchy
Prefer official legal text, regulator guidance, standards bodies, and authoritative framework sources before secondary commentary.
Scope matching
Product claims should match current public product pages and verified internal product materials. If uncertain, narrow or remove.
No guarantee language
Move78 materials must not claim compliance, audit success, certification success, buyer approval, or security assurance.
Source hierarchy used for regulated content
Move78 pages should rank sources by authority. Vendor blogs and secondary commentary can add context, but they should not carry legal, regulatory, statistical, or security claims by themselves.
| Priority | Source type | Primary use | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Official legal text | Binding law and statutory wording | Use for legal dates, obligations, and operator-role wording. |
| 2 | Official regulator or public authority guidance | Guidance, policy positions, implementation context | Use for official interpretation and current enforcement context where available. |
| 3 | Standards and frameworks | ISO, NIST, OWASP, IMDA, and similar reference material | Use for framework structure, not unsupported legal conclusions. |
| 4 | Credible professional sources | Trade, legal, cybersecurity, and governance context | Use for market context and practitioner interpretation. |
| 5 | Research with methodology | Surveys, studies, or empirical claims | Use only when method, sample, and date are visible enough to assess. |
| 6 | Vendor commentary | Context and product-market signal | Never use as the only basis for legal, statistical, or security claims. |
Claim control rules
Move78 should write claims like an implementation practitioner, not like a marketing page trying to win every comparison.
Allowed language
- Helps organize implementation evidence.
- Supports internal preparation and buyer-facing evidence structure.
- Maps selected framework concepts to practical artifacts.
- Provides operational implementation guidance.
- Designed for teams that need editable evidence records.
Banned or high-risk language
- Compliance or audit-success promises.
- Certification readiness without qualification.
- Official approval, buyer acceptance, or legal status claims without evidence.
- Attack prevention, risk elimination, or universal security claims.
- Superlatives that cannot be verified and defended.
What readers should expect from Move78 pages
Move78 pages should help readers take the next practical step: classify, map, document, assign, verify, review, escalate, or buy the right implementation artifact.
| Reader need | Move78 page behavior | Route |
|---|---|---|
| Understand a framework | Give a quick answer, artifact table, implementation checklist, source note, and FAQ. | Guides |
| Diagnose a gap | Use browser-based checks and route the result to downloads, ACT, or advisory. | Tools |
| Start evidence work | Provide lite templates or starter files without leaking paid product IP. | Downloads |
| Choose buying route | Compare DIY, templates, SaaS, consulting, and ACT without unsupported superiority claims. | Comparison page |
| Build implementation evidence | Route to ACT-1, ACT-2, or the implementation sprint based on need. | Pricing |
Source and review note: This methodology page describes Move78 publishing discipline and claim-control boundaries. It is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity assessment advice, buyer approval, or security assurance.
Use pages that show their limits.
Move78 content is designed to help teams build implementation evidence without pretending that templates, tools, or guidance replace professional judgment.
Browse implementation guides