Colorado AI Act in · EU AI Act (High-Risk) in · ISO 42001 + NIST AI RMF + OpenClaw + Agentic AI — organized into editable implementation artifacts
RAG disclosure and poisoning governance assessment

RAG / Vector Trust & Data Disclosure Check

Assess in under 5 minutes whether the current RAG and vector pipeline could leak sensitive information or trust poisoned content.

4-5 minutes Browser-only scoring No stored answers Retrieval trust and data disclosure

This screen is for teams using knowledge bases, retrieval-enabled copilots, or internal assistants who need a governance answer before broader rollout or higher-sensitivity data access.

  • Checks source trust, ingestion review, data-classification boundaries, leakage control, takedown readiness, and answer traceability.
  • Flags whether the retrieval posture is controlled, constrained, materially risky, or not governable for enterprise use.
  • Routes to AI Controls Professional when the missing layer is data-handling policy, incident readiness, evidence, and formal impact review.
Enterprise retrieval governance illustration showing trusted and untrusted knowledge sources, access boundaries, takedown controls, and evidence-based disclosure investigation readiness.
Enterprise retrieval governance illustration showing trusted and untrusted knowledge sources, access boundaries, takedown controls, and evidence-based disclosure investigation readiness.
OWASP-aligned data-trust screen

What this assessment evaluates

This assessment classifies the current posture quickly, surface the biggest gaps, and surface governance gaps and recommend the appropriate implementation path.

What this tool evaluates

This assessment evaluates whether the current retrieval stack can defend source trust, data boundaries, leakage controls, takedown discipline, and investigation traceability.

What a tighter-boundaries result does not mean

It does not mean the retrieval system is broken. It means wider rollout should wait until trust boundaries, evidence, or review discipline are stronger.

Why AI Controls Professional completes the picture

The missing value is data handling policy, disclosure response procedure, evidence discipline, and formal impact review. That sits in AI Controls Professional.

Question 1 of 120% complete
Question 1 of 12

What this result should change

This section highlights the key governance gaps the assessment identified and recommends appropriate next steps.

What this tool evaluates

This assessment evaluates whether the current retrieval stack can defend source trust, data boundaries, leakage controls, takedown discipline, and investigation traceability.

What a tighter-boundaries result does not mean

It does not mean the retrieval system is broken. It means wider rollout should wait until trust boundaries, evidence, or review discipline are stronger.

Why AI Controls Professional completes the picture

The missing value is data handling policy, disclosure response procedure, evidence discipline, and formal impact review. That sits in AI Controls Professional.

Where to go next

When the assessment reveals structural control gaps requiring policy, procedure, evidence, lifecycle discipline, or implementation ownership, AI Controls Professional provides the full implementation evidence pack.

This page is informational only. It does not provide legal advice, compliance certification, or an audit conclusion.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What does this tool check?

It checks whether your retrieval layer is governed well enough to trust the sources, control disclosure risk, and explain how retrieved content influences outputs and actions.

Who should use this screen?

Use it if your AI system retrieves documents, knowledge-base content, external references, vector-search results, or mixed trusted and untrusted sources before generating an answer or action.

Does this tool scan our vector database or documents?

No. It does not inspect your content, index, or embeddings. It is a governance assessment that helps you judge whether source trust, ownership, access, and review controls are mature enough.

Why does source ownership matter so much?

Because retrieval becomes harder to trust when nobody clearly owns the source, approves ingestion, or can explain how stale, poisoned, or sensitive content is handled.

What does a weak result usually mean?

Usually it means the retrieval layer is pulling from broad or poorly governed sources, with weak trust tiering, limited disclosure review, or missing evidence on what content can influence outputs.

Does this tool store or transmit my answers?

No. This tool runs entirely in your browser. Your selections are not stored, synced, exported, or transmitted by the page itself.

Source and review note: This page was last reviewed on 6 May 2026 against the current Move78 public site baseline and relevant official or authoritative sources where laws, standards, frameworks, cybersecurity controls, product scope, pricing, support policy, or implementation guidance are discussed. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.