Assess in under 5 minutes whether the current RAG and vector pipeline could leak sensitive information or trust poisoned content.
This screen is for teams using knowledge bases, retrieval-enabled copilots, or internal assistants who need a governance answer before broader rollout or higher-sensitivity data access.

This assessment classifies the current posture quickly, surface the biggest gaps, and surface governance gaps and recommend the appropriate implementation path.
This assessment evaluates whether the current retrieval stack can defend source trust, data boundaries, leakage controls, takedown discipline, and investigation traceability.
It does not mean the retrieval system is broken. It means wider rollout should wait until trust boundaries, evidence, or review discipline are stronger.
The missing value is data handling policy, disclosure response procedure, evidence discipline, and formal impact review. That sits in AI Controls Professional.
This section highlights the key governance gaps the assessment identified and recommends appropriate next steps.
This assessment evaluates whether the current retrieval stack can defend source trust, data boundaries, leakage controls, takedown discipline, and investigation traceability.
It does not mean the retrieval system is broken. It means wider rollout should wait until trust boundaries, evidence, or review discipline are stronger.
The missing value is data handling policy, disclosure response procedure, evidence discipline, and formal impact review. That sits in AI Controls Professional.
When the assessment reveals structural control gaps requiring policy, procedure, evidence, lifecycle discipline, or implementation ownership, AI Controls Professional provides the full implementation evidence pack.
Get the implementation documents, procedures, evidence assets, and governance pack this free screen intentionally does not generate.
Read the OWASP Top 10 For Large Language Model Applications guide to understand the underlying control themes and risk categories.
Read the governance guide for the policy, ownership, and control architecture behind this screen.
Read the incident-response guide for shutdown, logging, evidence, and escalation discipline.
It checks whether your retrieval layer is governed well enough to trust the sources, control disclosure risk, and explain how retrieved content influences outputs and actions.
Use it if your AI system retrieves documents, knowledge-base content, external references, vector-search results, or mixed trusted and untrusted sources before generating an answer or action.
No. It does not inspect your content, index, or embeddings. It is a governance assessment that helps you judge whether source trust, ownership, access, and review controls are mature enough.
Because retrieval becomes harder to trust when nobody clearly owns the source, approves ingestion, or can explain how stale, poisoned, or sensitive content is handled.
Usually it means the retrieval layer is pulling from broad or poorly governed sources, with weak trust tiering, limited disclosure review, or missing evidence on what content can influence outputs.
No. This tool runs entirely in your browser. Your selections are not stored, synced, exported, or transmitted by the page itself.
Source and review note: This page was last reviewed on 6 May 2026 against the current Move78 public site baseline and relevant official or authoritative sources where laws, standards, frameworks, cybersecurity controls, product scope, pricing, support policy, or implementation guidance are discussed. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.