Colorado AI Act in · EU AI Act (High-Risk) in · ISO 42001 + NIST AI RMF + OpenClaw + Agentic AI — organized into editable implementation artifacts

Estimated time: ~4 minutes · 12 questions · 6 control domains

UC Berkeley Agentic AI Risk Profile Assessment

A focused 12-question executive screen that translates the UC Berkeley CLTC Agentic AI Risk-Management Standards Profile into practical governance checks. It is written in plain English for CISO, CRO, legal, compliance, risk, product, and technology leaders assessing autonomy, authority, tool access, containment, and post-deployment oversight.

In-browser processing
No account required
No login required
UC Berkeley CLTCAgentic AI ProfileBounded AutonomyDefense-in-Depth

Privacy-first design. This assessment runs entirely in your browser. The assessment is designed to run in your browser without account creation or server-side answer submission. Avoid entering confidential information into any free-text field.

Live Assessment Dashboard
Score
0/36
Answered
0/12
Posture
Not assessed
Gaps Found
0

Assessment Complete

0/36

Top Priority Gaps

Questions scored No or Partly - highest impact first.

Domain Breakdown

Move from screening to control design

Use this result to decide whether you need a formal agent register, bounded-autonomy policy, runtime containment, stronger third-party control, or immediate escalation to legal, risk, security, or executive review. AI Controls Starter and Professional provide the control and documentation path.

Data sovereignty confirmation. This assessment ran entirely in your browser. Your answers never left your device. We did not transmit, sync, or store a single byte of your responses. Once you close this page, all data is gone.

Frequently asked questions

Who should use this?

This assessment is intended for CISO, CRO, legal, compliance, risk, security, product, and technology leaders translating the UC Berkeley CLTC Agentic AI Risk-Management Standards Profile into practical enterprise controls.

What does it cover?

It emphasizes the UC Berkeley profile's distinctive levers: degrees of agency, bounded autonomy, authority and environment access, multi-agent system effects, defense-in-depth, containment, shutdown, and post-deployment oversight.

Is this tied to one vendor or platform?

No. It is a practical executive screen based on the UC Berkeley CLTC profile and related risk-management concepts. It helps management identify gaps and decide where deeper review, control design, or legal analysis is needed.

Does this store my answers?

No. The assessment is designed to run in your browser without account creation. Avoid entering confidential information into free-text fields.

Source and review note: This page was last reviewed on 6 May 2026 against the current Move78 public site baseline and relevant official or authoritative sources where laws, standards, frameworks, cybersecurity controls, product scope, pricing, or support policy are discussed. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.