Skip to main content
Colorado ADMT: 1 Jan 2027 · EU high-risk: 2 Dec 2027 (Annex III); 2 Aug 2028 (Annex I)
Home › Tools › OpenClaw Skill Approval Gate
OpenClaw supplier review gate

OpenClaw Skill Approval Gate

Decide in under 4 minutes whether an OpenClaw skill belongs in sandbox, production review, or the reject pile.

3-4 minutes 12 scored questions No login

This is a governance gate for skills, connectors, and MCP-style integrations. It is not a malware scanner, static code analyzer, or signature-based security verdict.

  • Screens source trust, provenance, sandbox testing, permission scope, data exposure, rollback, logging, and approval workflow maturity.
  • Separates governable skills from opaque skills that should stay out of production.
  • ACT includes supplier and subprocessor review records and proposed contract wording for local legal and procurement review. Your team verifies the evidence and resolves open issues.
Start assessment Download Skill Approval Log (Excel) See ACT pricing
Enterprise review gate for OpenClaw skills showing provenance checks, sandbox evaluation, permissions control, and rollback readiness.
Skill and connector approval triage across provenance, permissions, rollback, and approval evidence.
Tool 2 of 4

This is a governance gate for skills, connectors, and MCP-style integrations. It is not a malware scanner, static code analyzer, or signature-based security verdict.

Interactive screen

Assessment

Use this to classify a proposed OpenClaw skill or connector as approvable with standard controls, sandbox-only, hold for governance review, or reject.

Question 1 of 12 0% complete
Question 1 of 12

What this result should change

This section classify the governance posture quickly, highlight the biggest gaps, and surface governance gaps and recommend an appropriate implementation path.

What this tool evaluates about a skill

This assessment evaluates whether a proposed OpenClaw skill or connector is governable from a supplier-review standpoint, including provenance, testing, access, rollback, and approval workflow discipline.

What a sandbox-only result does not mean

Sandbox only does not automatically mean the skill is malicious. It means the evidence and control posture are too weak for normal enterprise rollout.

How ACT supports an evidence review

The missing value is a repeatable supplier-review workflow, retained evidence, approval logic, and policy linkage. ACT includes supplier and subprocessor review records and proposed contract wording for local legal and procurement review. Your team verifies the evidence and resolves open issues.

Where to go next

When the assessment identifies control gaps, discuss the required scope and evidence with Move78. ACT includes an editable board oversight deck and written briefing, supported by intake, ownership, supplier and executive decision records. Your team gathers the evidence and records the next action.

ACT

See the editable ACT records for supplier review, evidence, and agentic governance.

OpenClaw Enterprise Governance Checklist

Use the broader governance checklist alongside this approval gate.

AI Vendor Due Diligence for SMEs

Read the related due-diligence article that supports the approval workflow.

This page is informational only. It does not provide legal advice, compliance certification, or an audit conclusion.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What does this tool evaluate about a skill?

It evaluates provenance, maintainer trust, sandbox testing, permissions, data exposure, rollback, logging, ownership, and approval workflow maturity for a proposed OpenClaw skill or connector.

Does a sandbox-only result mean the skill is malicious?

No. It means the evidence or control posture is not strong enough for standard enterprise rollout. The right next step is controlled testing, not automatic trust.

Why are provenance and rollback weighted so heavily?

Because a skill with weak provenance and no reliable rollback path can expand blast radius faster than teams expect, even before formal production approval exists.

Why is a formal approval workflow necessary?

Because marketplace enthusiasm is not an enterprise control. A formal workflow creates retained evidence, owner accountability, and consistent decisions across skills and connectors.

Does this tool store anything I enter?

No. The assessment runs entirely in the browser. Answers are not stored, synced, or submitted to a server.

Source review dates are stated in the relevant guides. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.