AI Vendor Due Diligence Pack
Screen AI vendors, copilots, agents, and embedded AI suppliers before approval or procurement sign-off.
Open artifact page →A fast procurement triage layer for external AI vendors. It helps you decide whether a vendor deserves formal review, should move forward only with conditions, or is too opaque to onboard yet.
AI Controls Professional gives you the full vendor due-diligence procedure and questionnaire needed to validate this vendor properly. Use the screen to triage. Use the paid toolkit to execute.
This screen is for procurement triage. This assessment does not determine that a vendor is safe. The results indicate whether the vendor looks clear enough, governable enough, and replaceable enough to justify formal review.
A stronger result usually means the vendor is comparatively transparent about data use, dependencies, retention, assurance evidence, and incident commitments. That still does not remove the need for formal due diligence or contract review.
A weak result usually means the vendor is too opaque, too dependency-heavy, or too thin on control evidence to justify a light-touch onboarding path. That is where procurement teams lose time if they skip disciplined review.
Why a vendor questionnaire does not replace system traceability and dependency visibility.
How supplier governance and documented information fit inside a management-system build.
Operationalize third-party AI governance using a practical risk-management lens.
See the paid toolkit that covers the full vendor due-diligence procedure and questionnaire.
This assessment screens whether an AI vendor looks ready for formal procurement review by testing transparency, subprocessors, retention and deletion clarity, assurance evidence, incident commitments, data sensitivity, ownership, and lock-in risk.
No. Proceed only means this first-pass screen did not surface obvious structural blockers. It is not a substitute for due diligence, contract review, privacy review, or security validation.
Because opaque data use, hidden dependencies, or weak incident commitments make governance, auditability, and customer assurance materially harder even when the product demo looks strong.
Because vendor lock-in changes the commercial and control posture. A black-box provider that is hard to replace deserves more scrutiny than a low-dependency tool with a clear exit path.
No. The scoring runs entirely in the browser. Answers are not transmitted, synchronized, or stored by Move78. Once the page is refreshed or the browser closes, the run is gone.
The pre-screen identifies vendor risk. The due diligence pack gives procurement, security, and governance owners a structured intake and approval artifact.
Screen AI vendors, copilots, agents, and embedded AI suppliers before approval or procurement sign-off.
Open artifact page →Source and review note: This page was last reviewed on 6 May 2026 against the current Move78 public site baseline and relevant official or authoritative sources where laws, standards, frameworks, cybersecurity controls, product scope, pricing, support policy, or implementation guidance are discussed. It provides operational implementation guidance and product information only; it is not legal advice, tax advice, audit assurance, certification assurance, conformity-assessment advice, buyer-approval assurance, or security assurance. Validate legal, regulatory, contractual, tax, audit, and security decisions with qualified professionals.